I leave for a few days and…

So, I leave for a few days away from the world and this hits:

The Army psychiatrist charged in the 2009 Fort Hood shooting rampage will represent himself at his upcoming murder trial, meaning he will question the more than two dozen soldiers he’s accused of wounding, a military judge ruled Monday.

Maj. Nidal Hasan’s attorneys will remain on the case but only if he asks for their help, the judge said. Hasan, 42, faces the death penalty or life in prison without parole if convicted of 13 counts of premeditated murder and 32 counts of attempted premeditated murder.

After questioning Hasan for about an hour, the judge, Col. Tara Osborn, ruled that Hasan was mentally competent to represent himself and understands “the disadvantage of self-representation.” She repeatedly urged him to reconsider his request, noting that the lead prosecutor has more than 20 years of experience and that Hasan will be held to the same standards as all attorneys regarding courtroom rules and military law.

Wow. Just wow. I was expecting a very boring (but technically interesting) case. I was wrong. Very wrong. This may be both painful and unbelievably entertaining to any observer. Brace yourself.

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “I leave for a few days and…

  1. Wonder how the “defense of others” he’s purportedly using will help with his murder charge for the nurse practitioner he shot and killed.
    Also, if he uses “defense of others”, will they reclassify this terrorism as terrorism and not “workplace violence”?
    Just gets worse and worse…

    • The interesting thing is that, when a nurse I know was in Iraq, the local population was extremely intolerant of any action/potential harm to healthcare workers. They had extremely elevated opinions of our healthcare professionals, particularly considering the help they brought to the people of Baghdad. I suspect many would be angry to know that a highly skilled nurse was killed and not made available to deploy and ply their craft in the Middle East.

      As for the angles worked by the prosecution, I think their best bet is to keep this thing as simple as possible and present the panel (jury) with a very calm and reasonable accounting of the case. After all, it speaks for itself.

Comments are closed.